Italian court rules food theft 'not a crime' if hungry

27.27% credibility
 
Related

10 Vitamins women should take to prevent serious health problems!

Luffy News
362 points

This mom s punishment for her son is getting praise from all over the world

Luffy News
456 points



Most recent

Vejez vs Senectud

Juan Cantalatabla
16 points

LAIKA: un héroe de cuatro patas que alimenta a más de 250 animales afectados por los incendios

Juan C
6 points

La Rusia de Putin muy cerca de ganar la carrera para conseguir la vacuna contra el cáncer

NOTICIAS-ETF
8 points

Por favor, por nuestra salud y la tuya, no cruces las piernas

NOTICIAS-ETF
8 points

¿A qué se debe el resurgimiento de las barberías?

Saludables
12 points

Numa, Numa para un martes cualquiera

El diario de Enrique
8 points

Sophos: líder en seguridad de endpoints para medianas empresas, según IDC MarketScape

Prensa
10 points

Waya Guajira: Nuevas propuestas culinarias diseñadas para exaltar los sabores únicos de La Guajira

Comunicaciones
12 points

Dos monjas en peligro de ser violadas (cuento)

El diario de Enrique
8 points

Kumon Connect: el método de estudio que se moderniza y salta a lo digital

Prensa
6 points
SHARE
TWEET
Stealing small amounts of food to stave off hunger is not a crime, Italy's highest court of appeal has ruled.

Italian court rules food theft 'not a crime' if hungry

Judges overturned a theft conviction against Roman Ostriakov after he stole cheese and sausages worth €4.07 (£3; $4.50) from a supermarket.

Mr Ostriakov, a homeless man of Ukrainian background, had taken the food "in the face of the immediate and essential need for nourishment", the court of cassation decided.

Therefore it was not a crime, it said.

A fellow customer informed the store's security in 2011, when Mr Ostriakov attempted to leave a Genoa supermarket with two pieces of cheese and a packet of sausages in his pocket but paid only for breadsticks.

In 2015, Mr Ostriakov was convicted of theft and sentenced to six months in jail and a €100 fine.

'Right and pertinent' ruling, say papers
For the judges, the "right to survival prevails over property", said an op-ed in La Stampa newspaper (in Italian).

In times of economic hardship, the court of cassation's judgement "reminds everyone that in a civilised country not even the worst of men should starve".

An opinion piece in Corriere Della Sera says statistics suggest 615 people are added to the ranks of the poor in Italy every day - it was "unthinkable that the law should not take note of reality".
It criticised the fact that a case concerning the taking of goods worth under €5 went through three rounds in the courts before being thrown out.

The "historic" ruling is "right and pertinent", said Italiaglobale.it - and derives from a concept that "informed the Western world for centuries - it is called humanity".

However, his case was sent to appeal on the grounds that the conviction should be reduced to attempted theft and the sentence cut, as Mr Ostriakov had not left the shop premises when he was caught.

Italy's Supreme Court of Cassation, which reviews only the application of the law and not the facts of the case, on Monday made a final and definitive ruling overturning the conviction entirely.

Stealing small quantities of food to satisfy a vital need for food did not constitute a crime, the court wrote.

"The condition of the defendant and the circumstances in which the seizure of merchandise took place prove that he took possession of that small amount of food in the face of an immediate and essential need for nourishment, acting therefore in a state of necessity," wrote the court.
SHARE
TWEET
To comment you must log in with your account or sign up!
Featured content