Restricted meal times might not be the best idea for dieters, study suggests

34.38% credibility
 
Related

Researchers Are Pretty Sure They've Found A New Planet In Our Solar System

Four
2578 points

6-Year-Old Boy Treats His Mom to a 'Dinner Date' Once a Month With His Allowance Money

Four
2292 points



Most recent

Las ventajas de usar un software a medida para tu negocio

MaríaGeek
12 points

Entrega de medicamentos postrasplante en medio de la crisis del sistema de salud

Prensa
20 points

La Crisis Diplomática que Sacudió a Colombia y Estados Unidos: Un Análisis Profundo

Carlos Eduardo Lagos Campos
72 points

La Verdad Oculta de San Juan del César: Instituciones Públicas Secuestradas por Intereses Privados

Luis Horgelys Brito Ariza
340 points

Violaciones a los Derechos Humanos y la Democracia en Venezuela

Carlos Eduardo Lagos Campos
28 points

Cómo funcionan las puertas automáticas

MaríaGeek
10 points

¿Qué significa que un crucero es todo incluido?

MaríaGeek
16 points

Seguridad en temporada de ofertas, pilar para el éxito del retail

John Mikan
30 points

Una lucha ciudadana por la seguridad y el bienestar de San Juan del Cesar, la Guajira.

Luis Horgelys Brito Ariza
52 points

¡Hackers están aprovechando! El abuso de aplicaciones 'confiables' se dispara un 51%

Prensa
32 points
SHARE
TWEET
If you're thinking of trying to lose a little weight, you might be considering a diet that limits the amount of calories you'll consume during the day. But regardless of the food plan you choose, it might not be the best idea to restrict your eating to limited windows during the day.

Restricted meal times might not be the best idea for dieters, study suggests

A new study has found that rats learn to eat more when their feeding schedules become restricted, thanks to a hunger hormone that kicks in to help them make the most of their limited chow-time.


The hormone in question is called ghrelin, the effect of which reduces the feeling of fullness when we consume food. In the study, the rats had their meal times restricted to a daily 4-hour window over the course of several days. After the hours had passed, a full 20 hours would follow before the rats had a chance to feed again.

This restrictive feeding schedule boosted the ghrelin hormone in the rats, encouraging them day-by-day to eat more, until they eventually learned to double their usual food intake. The findings are reported in eLIFE.

"We are looking deep into the higher order functions of the brain to unpick not just which hormones are important for controlling our impulses but exactly how the signals and connections work," said Scott Kanoski, one of the researchers from the University of Southern California.

The researchers found that ghrelin communicates with neurons in the hippocampus – a region of the brain that controls memory and motivation, and is likely related to how anticipation of food can increase intake.

Once ghrelin has stimulated feelings of appetite in the hippocampus, the neurons there then tell the hypothalamus to produce a molecule called orexin, which promotes excessive eating – also known as polyphagia or hyperphagia.

If the whole process turns out to work in humans the same way, it might just help us to control eating habits that contribute to health problems like obesity. According to the researchers, the ghrelin hormone may once have been an important survival mechanism, but it's well past its use-by date in the developed world.

"This is an adaptive response to limited food access, but one that is no longer relevant in the Western world," said Kanoski, "where instead we need to find new ways to help us fight some of the feeding responses we have to external cues and circadian patterns."

The researchers previously found that ghrelin signals to the hippocampus could increase rats' food intake in response to visual signals the animals had learned to associate with an imminent meal – much like Pavlov's dog.

If they can figure out how to reduce the effect of ghrelin by genetically suppressing the activity of a receptor in the hippocampus that responds to the hormone, we might be able to turn off the switch that encourages us to binge on large quantities of food. And for many in developed countries, that can only be a good thing.

"Over a third of Americans are obese and another third are overweight," said Kanoski, "so we feel we have an obligation to help identify new ways to reduce the burden on society and on our healthcare systems."

Fuente: www.sciencealert.com
SHARE
TWEET
To comment you must log in with your account or sign up!
Featured content