People who curse a lot have better vocabularies than those who don't, study finds

 
Related

Rescued bear, lion and tiger "brothers" refuse to be separated after 15 years together

Puyol Mos
680 points

Human Trials For A Vaccine That Destroys Cancerous Tumors Just Began

Puyol Mos
500 points



Most recent

Sigo queriendo ser un niño

El diario de Enrique
6 points

El límite de 1,5ºC, en riesgo: las emisiones de los países más contaminantes vuelven a aumentar

NOTICIAS-ETF
10 points

5 estrategias efectivas para jugar al póker online

MaríaGeek
10 points

DESENCUENTRO ENTRE DOS MUNDOS

pensamiento Libre
188 points

8 pescados a evitar si no quieres comer mercurio (ni otras sustancias)

NOTICIAS-ETF
18 points

Los humanos provocamos el cambio climático: 99.9 % de estudios científicos coinciden

NOTICIAS-ETF
8 points

La teoría de la conspiración que defiende que el Titanic nunca se hundió

NOTICIAS-ETF
202 points

La inevitable decadencia de la vejez y el trato que no merecen los ancianos

El diario de Enrique
10 points

Si bebes esta cantidad de cerveza (o de vino), podrías ser alcohólico

NOTICIAS-ETF
12 points

"Completamente paralizada": las impactantes imágenes de una joven tras ser drogada con el "spiking"

NOTICIAS-ETF
8 points
SHARE
TWEET
If someone’s ever accused you of sounding less intelligent because you swear too much, don't worry - science has got your back. A new study has found that those who have a healthy repertoire of curse words at their disposal are more likely to have a richer vocabulary than those who don’t.

People who curse a lot have better vocabularies than those who don't, study finds

This challenges the long-held stereotype that people swear because they can’t find more intelligent words with which to express themselves. As Stephen Fry once said, "The sort of twee person who thinks swearing is in any way a sign of a lack of education or a lack of verbal interest is just f*cking lunatic."

Psychologists Kristin Jay and Timothy Jay of Marist College and the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts (not clear if related) came up with the hypothesis that people who are well-versed in curse words are more likely to have greater overall language fluency too.

For the first experiment, they gathered 43 participants (30 women) aged between 18 and 22 years, and first asked them to rattle off as many swear or taboo words as they could in 60 seconds. Next, they had to recite as many animal names as they could in 60 seconds. The researchers used animal names as an indication of a person's overall vocabulary and interest in language.

As any intelligible American English taboo word or phrase was considered fair game, the participants ended up generating a total of 533 taboo words, including the rather obscure "cum dumpster" and "ass pirate". The participants also submitted to so-called FAS tasks, which are standardised verbal fluency tests.

In a second experiment, another 49 participants (34 women) aged between 18 and 22 were asked to perform a similar task - this time they were asked to write down as many curse words and animal names starting with the letter "a" as they could. They also completed FAS tasks to assess their overall language fluency.

Publishing in the journal Language Sciences, the researchers also found that expressive curse words were generated at higher rates than slurs, and there was little difference between what the female and male participants could come up with. "[C]onsistent with findings that do not show a sex difference in taboo lexicon size, no overall sex difference in taboo word generation was obtained," they report.

They found that the ability to generate curse words was not an index of overall language poverty - in fact, they found that taboo fluency is positively correlated with other measures of verbal fluency.

"That is, a voluminous taboo lexicon may better be considered an indicator of healthy verbal abilities rather than a cover for their deficiencies," the researchers conclude. "Speakers who use taboo words understand their general expressive content as well as nuanced distinctions that must be drawn to use slurs appropriately. The ability to make nuanced distinctions indicates the presence of more rather than less linguistic knowledge, as implied by the POV [Poverty of Vocabulary] view."

Now, of course, it should be said that the sample size for this study was small, but until a larger cohort can be assessed, we can look to one of the greatest living masters of the English language, Stephen Fry, for his view. Watch below as he discusses the joys of swearing, and feel that sweet, sweet vindication. But just remember: dropping "ass pirate" into a job interview is still not advised.

Fuente: www.sciencealert.com
SHARE
TWEET
To comment you must log in with your account or sign up!
Featured content